|
|
Post by SED on Apr 29, 2003 18:31:27 GMT -5
Just noticed, a lot of netpeeker users seem to use additional firewalls together with netpekker.
It seems to me, netpeeker is a firewall in itself and using more of that stuff only causes instability.
Any thoughts on this subject?
|
|
|
|
Post by SEBEK on May 1, 2003 11:36:52 GMT -5
I use second firewall, because he blocks trojans in real time. I do not know whether NetPeeker this be able to.
BTW: I did not notice any problems using NetPeeker and my firewall.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gennadii on May 31, 2003 5:14:45 GMT -5
I have ZoneAlarm 3.7.143 and NetPeeker 2.53
ZonAlarm (in standard freeware set, non-"PRO") doesn't allow to block separate IP or subnet. It can ADD new trust, or to block an unwanted APPLICATION to talk to Internet.
NetPeeker let me specify IP inbound/outbound but I found that it just ignores, what I'm setting. IE6 still continue to open "blocked" site-IP
Any idea???
Thanks,
Gennadii (gpolubes@netvision.net.il)
|
|
